Showing posts with label genocide. Show all posts
Showing posts with label genocide. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Some Thoughts on Russia - Georgia

Nearly 3 weeks after Russia first rolled tanks and soldiers into the territory of Georgia, we have a nearly daily stream of news reports detailing the many ways that Russia is violating the cease-fire agreement, which you almost never hear mentioned in the Western media without Sarkozy's name attached to it. And now Russia is officially recognizing the breakaway states of Abkhazia and South Ossetia as independent nations, the first step in a process by the territories to join the Russian Federation. There are so many stunning things about this development in the Caucasus.

- First, it's pretty amazing how quickly nations are joining one side or the other. The U.S., U.K., France, Germany, Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and the Ukraine are all denouncing Russia as much as possible and proclaiming Georgia's right to its own "territorial integrity". Meanwhile, on the other side, Russia, Belarus, China, Moldova, and even America-hating Venezuela and Cuba have proclaimed that Russia was right to deploy peacekeeping troops to protect the security of its citizens.

- Soft propaganda from both sides is rampant. U.S. media always focuses on pictures of Georgians in anguish, while Russian media always focuses on pictures of Ossetians in anguish. I love reading the English version of ITAR-TASS's website, a website that looks like it came straight out of the Soviet oeuvre.

- Russia is really leaning on its regional allies to support them. They were really mad when Belarus waited a whole six days to finally back Russia. From ITAR-TASS:

On the fifth day of the operation the Kremlin decided it was enough. The Russian
ambassador to Belarus, Alexander Surikov, said, "It is not very clear to us why
the Belarussian authorities modestly keep quiet."

"One should be more explicit in expressing attitude to issues," he said.


Can't you just imagine a Bond-villain-like scenario with the Russian ambassador and his goons in his office in Minsk, stroking a cat and saying "Perhaps eets time to pay Lukashenko a visit to discuss eessue over cocktails. Molotov cocktails..."

- Posturing and saber-rattling is easily detected in the words both sides are choosing. Unfortunately, the Russians are the only ones with sabers to rattle. Other NATO countries are almost always reluctant to say anything confrontational, which is probably a good strategy. But the U.S. isn't reluctant. This is unfortunate, because the U.S. military is stretched dangerously thin, and everyone knows it. Therefore Russia will have the upper hand for awhile and there's nothing we can do about it.

- I don't think this could possibly escalate to Cold War levels, even with the added news about the U.S. and Poland installing a missile defense system. But before diplomacy can lead anywhere, the West must acknowledge that the South Ossetia conflict was started because of a poorly-thought-through invasion by Georgian forces into Tshkinvali. Every media source emphasizes Russia's forces invading Georgia and obliterating their military in violation with international law, but they all seem to conveniently under-report that it was that douchebag Saakashvili who ordered the invasion on a territory filled with people with Russian citizenship. Saakashvili should have known that Russia wasn't going to stand for it, particularly when most of Georgia's military forces were in Iraq and most of Russia's military forces were across Georgia's border. Almost every media report from Russia's ITAR-TASS makes prominent mention of Georgia's "blitzkrieg" on South Ossetia, and almost every media report from Western news sources conveniently glosses over that fact. If reconciliation is possible, American and European leaders are going to have to come to terms with the fact that the country with pending NATO membership is being led by a reckless idiot who will in all likelihood do more harm to NATO than good.

- Apparently Condoleeza Rice has become our de-facto new president. Every new statement by Putin, Medvedev, or other Russian authorities is always met by comments from Condoleeza Rice, not from President Bush. I think he's on vacation in Crawford, TX (I really couldn't say for sure), so that could be the reason for this sudden conspicuousness of the Secretary of State. It really doesn't matter though, just because the same Bush administration empty threats we usually hear from the president are now coming out of the mouth of the Secretary of State. U.S. diplomacy: everything stays on the table (except nuance).

- European ethnic groups are crazy. It's really easy for both sides to claim genocide based on ethnic cleansing because all these nations are founded on ethnic lines. Ethnic Georgians are killing ethnic Ossetians, while ethnic Russians are murdering ethnic Georgians, but since the Republic of Georgia was killing soldiers in the breakaway state of South Ossetia, and the Russian Federation killed people in the Republic of Georgia, it's hard to tell which actions are based on ethnic cleansing and which actions are based on strategic military missions.

- There is so much world news to comprehend, what with the Georgia thing, the deadliest case of civilian casualties by the U.S. military in Afghanistan, riots in Thailand, the breakup of Pakistan's coalition government and the revelation that Asif Ali Zardari is a nutjob, that it's simply astounding that 75% of our nations press corps is reporting and analyzing pre-scripted meaningless political drivel.

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

The G-Word, and Why We Should All Just Drop It

Maybe it's short-sighted of me to say this, or maybe it exposes my Americentric viewpoint, but for the love of God, why does 1) Turkey and 2) the United States Congress care so much about this resolution that labels the deaths of a million Armenians in the time of World War I as "genocide"?

1. We'll start with you, Turkey. The alleged genocide happened 90 years ago, so there can't be more than a few hundred Armenian survivors still left, so it's not like there will be altogether too many petitions for reparations, if that is even legal in your system. The resolution is "non-binding", according to CNN.com, even though I don't even know what that means in this context. I guess there will be no sanctions against the Ottoman Empire then. Good news for Mehmed VI.

Plus, rather than stonewalling and denial of past wrongdoings, admitting past genocide can help out with your admission into the EU. If Germany can be in there, so can you, Turkey. Their genocide was much more recent than yours. Repent now, and ye shall be allowed into the secret EU club, which gets ye half off admission to Tivoli Gardens and a free pass to steal jobs away from hard-working Britons.

Additionally, so what if the United States calls your actions against the Armenians genocide? They don't own the world. They have nothing to do with any of these 90 year old killings. If it makes you feel better, you can try to edit out any reference to genocide in your Wikipedia entry and let bygones be bygones.

2. Moving on to you, United States Congress. Think about military bases, and go find a globe. Now point to the best location for a potential base that could respond to a threat from and is located really close to Iran and Syria, and Iraq too, should it become a full-fledged puppet state of Iran within the next decade. Now, get rid of any location inside a country that A) supports terrorism, or B) is under the thumb of Vladimir Putin. Why look, you're left with Turkey! Hey, good news. We already have two bases there. Let's try and keep our access to them.

Okay, so we know Turkey is serious about this resolution for some reason. How do we know this? After France's parliament made a similar resolution last year, Turkey severred military ties with France. Even though they really shouldn't care, Turkey sees this kind of thing as a punch in the geopolitical nads. The United States would have a lot more to lose than to gain if it tried to excoriate the most important secular Muslim pro-democratic nation in the Middle East, both now (our need for stability in northern Iraq; 70% of our wartime supplies for Iraq come through Turkey) and in the future (Iran? Possibly Russia?).

And hey, maybe it wasn't genocide anyways. Turkey has acknowledged all those Armenian deaths, but they claim it was all part of the horrors of many millions of worldwide war deaths, more specifically a part of the power struggle between Russia and the Ottoman Empire. Most regimes don't often take credit for killing millions of people, but Turkey already has. They just don't like the term "genocide".

And who gave you, the United States Congress, the power to non-bindingly define conflicts as "genocide"? The United Nations? NATO?

Look, I know Bush is all against this resolution, and normally that would be enough reason for anyone to be for said resolution, but in this matter, he's got a point. It's best not to butt our noses into something that happened 90 years ago, especially when the issue has nothing at all to do with us, and especially when it all boils down to a war of terminology rather than substance.

Having said that, let us now stick it to the Chinese by welcoming the Dalai Lama with open arms.

- QP